Recall Scott Harden

Recall Scott Harden — He Said Marshall Was Fine
Stay Informed His Record Find Your Trustee
TL;DR

Scott Harden told parents at a public meeting that Thurgood Marshall was "fine." His private texts show he had already privately agreed to close it.

Read the Full Statement
Harden text to Kenne · Feb 4, 2026 · CPRA 26-084
"I'm plotting to close San Raf because I think locating schools where kids live is important and we tricked her into voting for the resolution so we could make changes to it after the fact."
Harden text to Kenne · Mar 19, 2026 · CPRA 26-084
"It's amazing how few high school consolidations in California. Hard to find success stories of any kind. More common to find high school mergers in the southeast."
Harden text to Kenne · Feb 27, 2026 · CPRA 26-084 — after learning a records request was coming
"Careful what you type!"
Read the Full Record Primary records archived at pusdfacts.org ↗
Harden moved the very resolution he privately admitted was a trick.

On December 11, 2025, Harden moved Resolution 2852 at a public meeting. That same morning, he texted Kenne confirming he had pre-negotiated the amendments privately with Fredericks. He wrote: "Just talked to Tina. She seems ok with my 3 amendments as a friendly for a first pass."

Exhibits to PUSD Brown Act Violation, Exh 4
He told Marshall parents the school was "fine" — while privately researching how to close it.

In March 2026, Harden used AI to research California high school consolidations and texted Kenne it was "hard to find success stories of any kind." That same month, he was publicly telling Marshall families the school was fine at a PTSA meeting.

When he knew records requests were coming, his advice was "Careful what you type!"

On February 27, 2026, when Kenne predicted a records request on their texts, Harden's response was to warn her to watch what she wrote — not to stop. The records came four weeks later and documented the full scope of private coordination.

Exhibits to PUSD Brown Act Violation, Exh 4

PUSD's Legal Justification for Closing Schools Doesn't Hold Up

The savings numbers had no source.

The EIA projects $4.6M in annual savings from closing Blair and Marshall. When asked for the basis, TSS cited "professional experience." No underlying data, no methodology, no source.

Transportation costs were left out entirely.

Moving Blair and Marshall students to schools miles away will require new bus routes. The EIA excluded all transportation costs as "too uncertain to estimate" — while locking in the savings.

The receiving schools don't have room.

Pasadena High and John Muir don't have capacity for the incoming students. The EIA used outdated capacity figures and acknowledged the deficit — then recommended the closures anyway.

The schools being closed are in better shape than the ones receiving them.

Marshall (3.54% FCI) and Blair (6.52%) have lower facility repair costs than Pasadena High (7.22%) and John Muir (9.58%). The district is closing its better-maintained campuses.

The district's own advisory committee rejected it unanimously.

The School Community Advisory Committee — the body convened specifically to review the EIA — voted unanimously to reject the report's findings. The board moved forward anyway.

School closures aren't even in the district's fiscal recovery plan.

PUSD's LACOE-required Fiscal Stabilization Plan lists 13 items totaling $83.1M in savings. Closing schools is not one of them. The board added closures on top — without updating the plan.

Read All 49 Findings
Next Key Date June 25 · Final Board Vote on School Closures Full schedule
Stay
Informed

Enter your email to receive updates on the recall campaign, including when and where to sign the petition. The recall requires wet signatures, ink on paper from registered District 4 voters.

Used only for the recall campaign. Not sold or shared.

Online Petition

Add your name to the community petition telling PUSD that closing schools is not the answer.

Sign the Petition
Key Dates Read the Evidence